Ecommerce: The Nexus of Delight & Retail Optimisation Mechanics

Nexus of delight 3 Ecommerce The Nexus of Delight amp Retail Optimisation Mechanics

Gamification has been a huge focus of my life, but the last few years have seen me change my career quite dramatically. I find myself in a role that no longer revolves around using game mechanics and the like.  Instead, I am focused on improving online retail experiences through testing, optimisation, personalisation, merchandising and so on.

Whilst gamification may seem a million miles away from this, there is actually very little difference. They are both focused on behavioural change – they just use different mechanics.

In gamification and retail optimisation, we are looking to change the behaviour of the user. We may choose an example such as increasing the frequency of how often you exercise using game mechanics in gamification, whereas in retail we may be more interested in reducing the bounce rate on home pages with personalised product recommendations. However, the core is the same. By understanding how people act, we can design interventions to promote or discourage certain behaviours.

The Nexus of Delight

So, what is the Nexus of Delight? Well, to understand this, we need to consider two opposing factions in the battle of behaviour. The user/customer and the provider/retailer.

In a retail environment the customer and the retailer have two very different needs. The retailer wants to make money, the customer wants to buy what they need without overspending. This is very simplistic, but often what it boils down to.

Of course, you can’t have both – you can’t sell everything too cheap, and you can’t expect to squeeze every penny out of a customer and have sustainable customer loyalty!

Both needs must meet somewhere in the middle – the Nexus of Delight (said with a deep booming voice with lots of echo).

Here the customer feels they are getting value (not necessarily just financial value – which we will get to) and the retailer gets a a happy customer, who solved their problem and generated revenue – wini win!

Think of the following example. A customer comes to a retail website looking for a jumper. They use the search and within seconds they are on a product detail page for a jumper they think might suit them. As they scroll down the page, they see a block of recommendations that shows similar products bought by other customers who viewed that product and then went on to buy something else. Here they see their perfect jumper. They click through and there it is – the jumper they always dreamed of. As they go to the add to basket button, they see a message “Free delivery if you spend £5 more”. Under the add to cart they see more recommendations – all of them for products that fit with the jumper and most of them around the £5 mark. They find a hat that there that they think would go perfectly and add it to their basket.

They are delighted because they found exactly what they wanted, they had a pleasant journey through the website and even found a hat they liked. All this, within budget, with free delivery and at no point did they feel taken advantage of or tricked. Remember, value is not just financial – it is the quality overall experience.

The retailer is also delighted, they made a sale with an uplift – whilst giving the customer a good experience, which with luck will lead to repeat visits.

The Nexus of Delight – they both got what they wanted and neither party felt anything negative towards the other! More importantly – the customer felt that the whole expereince was personalised based on their wants and needs – they were the center of the experience.

Image 500x415 Ecommerce The Nexus of Delight amp Retail Optimisation Mechanics
The Nexus of Delight

Retail Optimisation Mechanics

I wanted to just highlight something here as well, that goes back to me talking earlier about the use of mechanics. In games and gamification, mechanics are sets of rules that have specific outcomes in the game. For example, in Super Mario, one of the mechanics is the ability to jump. The height of his jumps is very carefully worked out to allow him to do all the things he needs in the game, without overbalancing the need for skill. If the jump is too high – the game is too easy, if it is too low – the game is impossible.

In the example above I reference 3 things I would consider to be Retail Optimisation Mechanics. The first is the search. A good search is essential for improving the customer experience if they are not 100% sure of what they want when they get to your site.

Secondly, the messaging that talks about free delivery thresholds. From a retail perspective, free delivery only makes sense if a customer spends over a certain amount of money. However, the customer needs to be aware of what that threshold is at just the right moment. If you go too early “spend £100 to get free delivery” they will not be interested. Go too late “Spend 50p to get free delivery” they may then struggle to find something they want that tops them up.

Finally, recommendations. I talk about two. The first is based on items like the product they are looking at. If I am looking for a jumper, there is no point saying, “You might like these T-shirts”. First, I am not in “T-shirt mode”, secondly, I am likely to think you are just trying to offload overstock on me. So contextual relevance is essential for the products being shown.

The other recommendation ties into the free delivery – items that not only match the product I am looking at, but also fit the budget needed to get the free delivery. This could easily also be a more “Complete the Look” style recommendation where you could then show me those T-shirts but under the context of “This T-shirt will complement the jumper you like”.

So What?

I suppose you are wondering so what? If not that, then may be “great, now how do I do that”.

Well, if you asked the first question, go read the blog again. If you asked the second – that is a blog for another day – but it involves data-driven decisions, testing, optimisation, and more testing.

If you get nothing else from this, take this away with you. Everything you want to do that may potentially drive a behavioural change – be it retail or otherwise – ask this question;

“What’s in it for them?”

Because that is the first question your customer is going to ask!

PDF Tray Ecommerce The Nexus of Delight amp Retail Optimisation Mechanics

Where Does Your Loyalty Lie?

Turner loyalty Where Does Your Loyalty Lie

I recently wrote a blog for the poor people who employ me, all about the future of loyalty. It got me thinking about the nature of loyalty, something I have not really thought about since my 2015 talk at GWC.

Rather than looking into the future though, my thoughts turned to where do people’s loyalties lie. More specifically, are they loyal to your company or to your loyalty card?

If I look at two loyalty programs, you may see what I am getting at. The two are Nectar and Tesco.

Tesco Loyalty Card

The Tesco loyalty card awards you points with each purchase at Tesco. Those points are converted into various rewards, such as money off vouchers, special offers and the like. I could reel off a dozen other loyalty schemes that work the same, from Debenhams to Shell.  Spend money, earn points, get discounts, spend points, repeat.

Nectar

Nectar is similar but has a core difference. You still use the card with purchases to collect points. You still then get to spend the points on discounts and other rewards. However, the key difference is that Nectar is not tied to any one retailer or company. Instead, companies can join the Nectar group and instantly get a loyalty scheme. Another example of a scheme like this can be seen in “Cashback” programmes like Quidco. In their case, you shop online via their website to get a percentage of your money back. Again, this is not fixed to any one retailer.

Loyal to the Store or the Card?

This is where the discussion of where your loyalties lie starts to surface. If you use Tesco on a regular basis because you like to collect the points, then are you loyal to Tesco or the Loyalty card?

Ask yourself, why do you go to Tesco? Is it because you find them better value, or because the reward card is great? If another retailer offered a better value card, would you jump to them?

Many will say no to this question, but multi store schemes like Nectar or Quidco would tend to show that is not quite true.

Watching my wife make purchasing decisions based on how much cashback she can get through Quidco is fascinating. Once she finds what she wants, she will go to the Quidco site and see who else sells it and which of them offers the best Cashback offer. She is no longer loyal to the store, but to Quidco!

This is where I see a specific danger with these multi store schemes, one that I think many people realised with Nectar. The choicer people have, the less “loyal” they will be.

As a retailer, you must ask yourself this…

Are they loyal to you or to your loyalty card?

If people can get the same thing elsewhere cheaper or at a better reward redemption rate, what else do you have that will keep them with you? What differentiates you from the crowd, beyond your loyalty card?

My Talk on Loyalty from GWC15

PDF Tray Where Does Your Loyalty Lie

A Story of Loyalty: Gamification World Congress 2015 Talk

True loyalty meme A Story of Loyalty Gamification World Congress 2015 Talk

Just thought I would share the video of my talk on loyalty and Christmas turkey from Gamification World Congress 2015

0

To give some context for the start – Bart Briers had just described me as The King of Gamification! At the end, I also caught him out as the talk was only 12 minutes long 😉

If you are interested in Gamification World Congress 2016, head over to their new website – you won’t be sorry and there are loads of videos from the last one to watch.

If you want to learn more about loyalty, you could always grab my book from Amazon 🙂

Oh and here are the slides – enjoy!!


True loyalty meme 500x500 A Story of Loyalty Gamification World Congress 2015 Talk

PDF Tray A Story of Loyalty Gamification World Congress 2015 Talk

Value to the User vs Value to You

Value to the system Value to the User vs Value to You

Here is a little excerpt for the book for you, you know that book that I am still editing but hope to have published in the next 2 weeks…!

Whist basing the value of the reward on a user’s personal investment is important, it is also important not to lose sight of why you were gamifying the system in the first place.

Normally it is because there are certain actions or activities that you want to encourage the user to perform and complete. That being the case, you have to sometimes consider how valuable the action is to you, not just how much effort it is for the user.

If an action is simple for the user and valuable to you – then reward them. If it is harder for them and valuable to you – reward them more. If it is easy and of low value to you – don’t reward them much. So far, so obvious.

However, it is when the activity is hard for the user, but of lower value to you, that it can get a bit tricky. First, ask the question “Do we actually want the user to do this if it is so hard for them and of so little value to us?” If you can answer that and still feel that the action is needed, you have to give them a decent reward. Not as much as you would if it was high effort for them and high value to you, but more than low effort and high value!

The picture below an outline of how this would work. The more stars, the greater the value of the reward. Again, this is value as perceived by the user!

Effort vs system value 500x375 Value to the User vs Value to You

As I say, the book should be out in the next week or two, sign up to find out when it is out and possibly even get a little early bird discount!

PDF Tray Value to the User vs Value to You

Amazon: Getting customer care wrong

Customer centric header Amazon Getting customer care wrong

Recently my wife pre-ordered a book from Amazon. She put her order in the day after pre-orders opened and chose super-saver delivery. Her understandable assumption was that if she pre-ordered, then the book would at least be dispatched on the day of release. She knew she would have to wait a few days for delivery, but that was fine.

The truth was a little different. The book was due for release on the 18th of June. Looking at her delivery estimates in Amazon, it stated the book was due for dispatch on the 22nd of June with a delivery estimate of 27th of June. She was a little confused by this.

So, she opened a dialog with customer support. Here is that conversation.

You’re now connected to Bob (name changed for privacy) from Amazon.co.uk

Me:Hi there,

I pre-ordered a book on 2nd June. I’ve just checked my order and it says that the item won’t be despatched until 22nd June which is 4 days after release day. I thought the point of pre-order was so that you had it either with you on the release date, or it was at least despatched on the release date? Can you please explain this to me.

Thanks

Bob:Hello, my name is Bob.

Thank you for contacting Amazon.co.uk. May I know your name please?

Me:Yes, it’s Laura

Bob:Hi Laura.

Me:Hi there.

Bob:I am sorry for the delay in delivering your order.

I will surely check this and help you.

Are you referring to the order for the item ” This Book”?

Me:Yes – it’s on order number xxx-xxx-xxx

Bob:Thanks for the details.

I have checked and see that you have placed this order via Free super saver delivery which will take 3 – 5 days to deliver the items.

This is the reason for the delay.

Me:I get that, but that doesn’t explain why it’s not being despatched on the release date at the very least.

Delivery type shouldn’t mean a delay on despatching the item in line with the release date.

Bob:To help you better I have now upgraded the delivery method to first class at free of charge.

Laura, we used to dispatch the items according to the delivery method.

Hope we are connected.

Me:I’m sorry but why should super saver delivery mean that a customer doesn’t have their product shipped in time for release or on the release date. That’s treating someone who places a bulk order and takes advantage of your own delivery offers as a second class citizen, and quite frankly makes you feel like you don’t particularly matter as a customer.

Bob:I am sorry that you feel this way.

Since the item is releasing on that day we will dispatch the items accordingly and there is no need to worry about this, Laura.

I have just requested them to dispatch your order as soon as possible.

Once we dispatch this item we ill update you via email.

Me:You’re missing the point here. If I order something in advance, it shouldn’t matter what the delivery method is, it should still be despatched to either reach me on release date or be sent on the release date otherwise what is the point of pre-ordering?

Bob:There is no need to worry about the estimated delivery date which is on our website.

I have requested them to deliver the this item much sooner.

Yes, I apologies for that Laura.

To get Release Day Delivery, orders must be placed by the applicable pre-order cut-off date – you must select First Class delivery no later than 4 days before release day, or One-Day no later than 2 days before release day.

Me:I’m not worrying about the estimated delivery date, I am questioning how Amazon can justify doing this on pre-ordered items when the whole point of pre-order is to receive an item on release date or at the very least have it despatched on that date. Delivery method should have no bearing on this. I ordered on 2nd of June which was 16 days ago, well before any ‘cut off’ date, and delivery method should have no bearing on despatch date. That is the point.

Bob:However, I have now upgraded the delivery method to First class at free of charge.

I have checked and see that you have placed this order via Free super saver delivery, Laura.

Me:Amazon have utterly failed in terms of customer care here. Upgrading me now is completely pointless given that release day is tomorrow. If you are not willing to treat Super Saver delivery customers orders as equaly important as those who select First Class, Next Day etc, then why even allow them to pre-order items in the first place?

Bob:I have also forwarded this issue to our internal team and requested them to avoid this issues in future.

Me:I am absolutely disgusted by this, and shall be cancelling my order.

Bob:I am sorry that you feel this way.

Laura, I have made everything to get your order on the 19 June, 2015.

We are sorry for the inconvenience caused by this.

Hope we are connected.

Your chat has been idle for one minute. I may close this chat after one more minute. If it isn’t convenient for you to reply to me at the moment, please contact us again later:

https://www.amazon.co.uk/contact-us

Me:I doubt that Amazon actually is sorry for any inconvenience Bob, but I appreciate your sentiment. I shall leave the order as is, but I think Amazon need to take a long hard look at how they treat super saver customers on pre-ordered items in terms of when an item is despatched. We are not second class citizens and should be entitled to the same despatch efficiency as any other customer. Thank you for taking the time to help me.

As you can see, my wife tried to valiantly explain that the issue was not that there would be a 3-5 day delivery time, but that the dispatch of the item would also be delayed by 3-5 days, even though she had pro-ordered. This meant that because she chose super-saver she would have to actually wait up to 10 days from release date, not the 5 she was prepared for. Bob was lucky he could not hear what she was saying during this conversation, just read her more tempered comments!

Whilst it seemed like a pleasant gesture to upgrade her delivery to first class, that was not the solution to the problem she had actually raised! Also, as it later transpired, the upgrade was not free, her charges had now updated to include this new delivery option!

What made the whole thing even more insulting was the closing message from Amazon;

Customer centric Amazon Getting customer care wrong

No Amazon, you did not solve the problem. You solved a symptom of the problem, but ignored the actual problem entirely. The whole thing felt prescriptive rather than “Customer-Centric”. It was as if there was a script with canned responses and solutions that could not be strayed from. She of course clicked no.

Further insult was piled on when she discovered that a friend who had ordered at the same time, using the same delivery options, received her book on the day of release.

There are a lot of issues with how this played out, but there are three main ones that stick out for me.

  • The first is that it was not made clear on the pre-order that the method of deliver not only affected how long it would take for the item to reach you , but that it also affected when the item would be dispatched.
  • Bob, whilst very polite and offering to upgrade the delivery method, completely missed the point of the complaint. This just lead to more frustration and a very circular conversation.
  • The gesture to upgrade delivery was not a gesture of goodwill as it was actually being paid for by us.

The outcome is that my wife now feels that Amazon may not be all it is cracked up to be. Had she just gone to a shop, she would have got her book a the same price (actually cheaper if you account for having to use premium delivery methods to get the book near release date). She would have never had to deal with Bob and would not be left wondering why she had bothered in the first place.

As I have said before, loyalty is about more than just price or convenience. It is a mix of things with one key feature being that you are made to feel valued as a customer. This sort of thing makes me wonder if Amazon has hit the point where they no longer care at all. Is that the fate of all companies that grow too big?

As a small conclusion, after a second frustrating conversation with Amazon, she declined the book and I bought it from her from our local Waterstones. It was a much nicer experience and worked out cheaper. I also had the opportunity to take my daughter, buy her a book and even buy myself one. Physical stores must not die!

 

PDF Tray Amazon Getting customer care wrong