Content is King – Even in Gamification

Crowned heart Content is King 8211 Even in Gamification
Anonymous

Andrzej Marczewski

Gamification Expert, author, consultant and designer. I love to write about it, talk about it and bore people to death with it! If you really want to get to know me, check out the About page.

You may also like...

13 Responses

  1. Hey Andrzej, first of all (since this is my first post here) I would like to say that I have enjoyed reading your articles. Good job.

    As for the quality being the most important factor, I wish you were right. So far the gamification has delivered some great examples of good implementation, yet the frenzy it has been met with also resulted with what I call lol-gamification, just throwing badges and achievements and gamifying with meaningless goals.

    I believe this doesn’t work and I hope this doesn’t work. So in a way I cheer for Gartner report (the one with 80% gamification implementations failing their objectives by 2014) to be partially right.

    However, especially in marketing this badge-fest continues and the platforms who deliver it grow. So sadly I am not so sure that people like you, me and others who want quality in this, are right. We might be right that with fun and meaningful goals the gamification looks prettier but having said this we might as well be shown marketing analyses, proving that people do function like those doves in classic psychology experiments and perform the tasks, caught in dopaminergic mechanisms and deprived of quality content.

    All in all, I am not so sure that quality will win in gamification. So far it has not been a massive victory. But we are yet to witness realistic analysis of these first years of gamification hype. So when the fails will go public, perhaps this shall be the moment, when the quality prevails.

    • Hey, thanks.

      As I say, quality is the long game. We are more likely to see it in enterprise than in marketing. Most efforts are aimed at short term engagement – and for some applications it had bee fairly well done.
      It is the large companies looking for innovation (Samsung nation for example) or long term behavioural change that will produce quality solutions.

      • Thanks for reply, Andrzej. I am afraid that the programs like Samsung Nation are most prone to become the examples of meaningless badgefest and actually this kind of design was something I mostly reffered to in my post when talking about my biggest gamification worries. It might be something beneficial in short-term, yes, but I don’t believe that watching videos for points with timer counting you seconds will be the future of building long-term engagement. My prediction is that when gamification hype fades out a bit, so will fade out popularity of platform-based programs because they are closer to complex loyalty programs, motivating extrinsically, than to game.

        • Hey Wojtek, the great thing about your concerns is that this is the normal way like every new technology, strategy, or anything else, works. Almost everything goes this Technology-curve that Gartner is promising. And after 80% failed, there will be the longterm opportunity for people like us to work on more qualitative projects.

          I’m sure at the end Gamification wont look like today. Pure Pointsification will move to the loyality-program-area and and Gamification will be more related with intrinsic motivation. We will have to combine more science from neuroscience and behaviorpsychology to establish Gamification as a serious strategy.

          If we are able to persuade (by using science) companies and people that the trigger and action of motivations happens long before someone is getting to the end of an activity and so also long before someone is seeing the result and is achieving a reward for finishing an activity than we will have a chance to stop this relying on badges and points.

          There is something that science knows and industry ignores ;-). But we will change that.

          But you are right. Patience and perserverance are our only chance to outlast this bullshit pointsification-Gamification.

          • Interesting. I would consider Samsung Nation as a success. It achieved its goal. Having points and badges is not a bad thing, if there is more to the system available after the shine wears off.

          • The bad thing is that most people start thinking about how to implement points and badges. But this stuff should be the last feature to add. If you start with the end I believe that most often it is just luck if something works out. I think that we will see in the longterm if Samsung Nation is a success. But if Samsung just wanted to achieve a short-term hype than, of course, it is already a success. But than it is more about loyality than the real power of gamification.

          • Great thoughts, guys.

            I totally agree with you, Roman, that what you call pointsiffication will hopefully evolve towards loyalty programs and gamification will become the branch oriented around instrisic rewards. But what you are saying I hardly ever hear from others because the current hype often seems to put equal sign between gamification and those complex loyalty programs taken from popular gamification platforms. At least it seems to be the area where the biggest money are put by the clients these days.

            As for Samsung Nation, I am not saying this is a failure but what I am saying is that implementations like this are likely to become the most overestimated feature of gamification. And if they fail, it might severly impact the image of gamification worldwide. I don’t have necessary data to feel I can provide 100% correct analysis on that but if you ask me I think that it all depends on goals and budget put into it.

            If examples like SN are considered a supportive marketing tool, targeted at die hard fans and if milions weren’t spent to create it, then perhaps yes, they are successful.

            But if this was implemented with intention of attracting broader audiences, creating breakthrough and serving as a major marketing tool and if milions were spend on it, then my bet would be that the results wouldn’t match the costs and ambitions. It is simply not attractive enough. Complete strangers will ignore an application which pretty much asks you to work for product promotion by completing tasks and offers you some rewards for it. As I said, it seems like a fair trade-off for dedicated fans but it won’t give the breakthrough which is such a chance in gamification.

            I think that recent popularity of such programs also stems from the fact that they are relatively easy to implement. The biggest challenge for proper gamification will be found in technological limitations because the demands of individual approach might loose with platforms offering “gamification instant”.

            Last but not least. I am not against badges and achievements. As a guy who spent almost 5k hours in MMOs I actually cherish them. I just would like them to be meaningful, that’s all, because this is what makes a difference. In games they work when they are put into context and the context is what is often missing in pointsification. So far I have “played” several gamified programs offered by major companies and I haven’t found a single one which would be immersive enough to really captivate like a good game.

          • A lot of this is lack of defined reason to Gamify. Also, Gamification is not about making games 😉

          • True dat but it would be great if it kept delivering stuff as engaging as them. 🙂

  2. Agree with you, Andrzej. We have been looking at gamification of eCommerce businesses here in India & while the implementation of well designed game mechanics is crucial to incentivizing user actions and rewarding loyalty – this has to be looked at as a piece of a larger jigsaw & not as a silver bullet. Well written!

    • Thanks! The game elements have to be good, but the system or process that they are being applied to have to work well. Now, there are exceptions. Sales logging for example lol. That is never going to be intrinsically fun!

  3. Awesome, thanks for mentioning, Andrzej. I came up with that after I remembered that we used to play soccer at the beginning of our team-handball training and there we were much more motivated to run than doing our normal exercises. 😉

  1. March 17, 2014

    […] 한 조각으로 생각해야 합니다. (지난 번 글에서도 제가 댓글에서 이 문구를 인용했습니다. 아마도 한글을 읽지는 못하시겠지만 Probal Shome 님께 […]

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *