Reading, Rewards and How to Accidentally Kill Joy

File 00000000ae3071f49cedefc3e82a6dc0 Reading Rewards and How to Accidentally Kill Joy

I recently ranted on LinkedIn about my youngest child’s school using attendance awards to encourage children to achieve 100% attendance. You can read that if you want my views on that particular bit of educational nonsense, but this rant is not about attendance.

This is about reading.

More specifically, it is about how a well-intentioned reward system managed to take something joyful, meaningful and personal, and turn it into a badge-chasing exercise.

When Reading Became a Quest

My youngest used to be an avid reader. Properly enthusiastic. The sort of child who would disappear into books because she wanted to, not because someone had built a laminated progress chart and started handing out shiny things. Read More ...

Gamification to encourage my daughter to read more

Reading Journey Gamification to encourage my daughter to read more

As any regular reader will know, I spend a lot of time gamifying my daughter, in a good way. She has taught me a great deal about what does and doesn’t work in the real world.

Most recently I was trying to encourage her to read more, so decided to test out my EEEE framework with her. She was doing it, but it was a real battle, she found it frustrating and not very enjoyable.

My Daughter, based on observation of how she plays games and acts, is part Free Spirit, part Achiever and part Player. That is to say, she likes to have freedom to choose, explore and be creative. She loves when she understands a new concept and nails it, but she does like to see some kind of reward if it is available.

Keep in mind, that whilst I was doing this, she was still getting books to read from school – books she HAD to read to not get in trouble.

Enrol

First, I needed to Enrol her into the idea that reading can be fun. I started to build a simple TWINE text adventure that had her and her little sister as the main characters in a story. She had short paragraphs to read and then she had to make a choice on what to do next – you can see the first couple of chapters here..

Enthuse

At the same time as I had her playing the “game”, we were trying to find books she might actually enjoy reading. Also, we tied her reading her school books into her Reward Meter (Click the link to see what I mean). Reading without moaning pushed her towards the 10, moaning and complaining pusher her towards the 0. This was to keep her reading what she HAD to read, whilst finding something she WANTED to read. The game got her into the idea that reading could be fun, and she got excited that the reading also contributed to how we felt she was behaving over all.

Engage

Finally, after some trial and error, we found a series (thankfully a very long series) of books that she really liked. She still had to mix reading that with reading her school signed books, but the fact she liked the new books and was no longer scared of the “chore” of reading, meant she started to get into it. At this point, even though she was still only reading when she had to, she was not complaining. Her reward for reading one of the books? The next book in the series, simple as that. We still tied the reading to overall behaviour, but did not make a big deal about it.

It is worth noting that enthuse and engage in this case were very similar in activity – so for all intents and purposes can be considered almost the same phase! During both phases we gave regular, but not excessive, verbal praise.

Endear

Finally, last week, the endear phase hit. I found her in a the living room, reading one of her books without anyone asking her to do it! I asked her why she was reading and she answered “Because I want to find out what happens next”. She had found a reason to keep reading because she WANTED to – in this case, curiosity (among other things of course).

Finding the intrinsic reason to keep doing something is the key to all good gamification. In this example, there were no rewards as such. The behaviour meter provided feedback for my daughter, so she understood where she was in out expectations. The extra books were more to enable her to continue to read than they were a reward. We did use verbal praise as well, but we are parents – if we didn’t do that, we would be failing our jobs horribly! However, we don’t praise her for every bit of reading she does, only now if she goes above and beyond the required reading by the school – and then not in an excessive way.

Time will tell if this sticks, but right now – I’m pleased as punch!!!

Critisism – well a rant really.

RANT Critisism 8211 well a rant really

This is a rant – you will find no insight here.. Move along…

I’ve written about criticism in the past, but wanted to bring it up again just for fun.

A couple of days ago, I received some criticism. Nothing to major, but for some reason it really set me off!

I Am pretty good with criticism, I grew up with it. From being labelled as stupid by a school that could not be bothered to offer help for dyslexics, to being called lazy by a medical practice that did not wish to diagnose M.E. as it did not exist, I deal with it pretty well.

These days I court constructive criticism. It makes me re-evaluate and improve when and where I can.

But in this instance I felt it was not needed. I was given the impression I was doing someone a favour, however that turned out to be my error as I had misinterpreted the request. I say misinterpreted, I had failed to read between the very hidden lines that were not made clear until they decided they felt my input had been disappointing. In reality it would have been easier if I had done nothing! Still I did it in my own time and of course – for free (possibly another failing…).

It got me thinking though. What price do you put on facts and knowledge.

My book had a mauling of a review on the German Amazon store. What struck me (other than the annoyance at being picked up on never getting to and too right), was a comment about everything I had written being easy to find on Wikipedia.

There was some truth to this of course. This is true of all non fiction texts (outside of cutting edge research papers), facts are facts and most are out there for anyone to copy and reuse (with the correct citation of course).

The thing is, that is not what I had / have done in the book. Then it struck me. Whilst facts are free, insight is another matter. When I speak on topics where I am covering the same ground trodden by many others before me, I try to make sure I come at it from my perspective and insight. I try to come up with angles that have not been covered before, or to simplify those that have. I also do not force people to engage with them – they do that of their own free will! I had another review that complained the book was simplistic… it is called Gamification: A Simple Introduction, it is in the title. That is like buying a maths book for 5 year olds and complaining it was too easy for a 20 year old.

I deal with criticism in many ways. Normally (as I have said) I take it on the chin and learn / move on. My issue is when it is levelled in an unfair or totally pointless way. Sadly the anonymity of the internet mixed with everyones new found ability to be an expert at everything (Google and Wikipedia), it is just a fact of life now. However, if you want to criticise, at least allow me to do the same with your original and interesting work…. oh…. wait…. never mind.

Maybe from now on I should stop doing people favours. Maybe if they all have to pay for my help, they would appreciate it more 😉

</rant>